Questions Raised Over FBI Evidence Handling in Charlie Kirk Case; Kash Patel Criticizes Investigation

09/16/2025 / By Finn Heartley

FBI’s Evidence Questioned: Forensic experts challenge FBI Director Kash Patel’s claims about a destroyed “confession note” and disputed DNA analysis in the Charlie Kirk assassination case, calling them speculative and inadmissible in court.
Doubt Over Ballistics & DNA: The FBI’s unverified claims of “transgender inscriptions” on ammunition and vague “positively processed” DNA lack concrete evidence, with experts noting unreliable bullet-matching science and missing lab documentation.
Political Motivations Alleged: Patel’s rhetoric—including references to “sorcerer’s spells” and unseen forces—fuels accusations of politicization, drawing parallels to past FBI controversies like January 6 prosecutions.
Fear of Expanded Crackdown: Concerns grow that the FBI may target dissent, especially with AG Pam Bondi’s push for “hate speech laws,” raising alarms about broader suppression of free speech.
Public Trust at Stake: Critics warn the case tests public gullibility, comparing unverified FBI narratives to COVID-era misinformation, emphasizing the need for transparency to restore faith in justice.

The FBI’s handling of evidence in the assassination case of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk has come under intense scrutiny, with forensic experts and critics questioning the reliability of key investigative claims. At the center of the controversy is FBI Director Kash Patel, who has faced accusations of politicizing the probe while failing to substantiate critical details—including the alleged existence of a confession note and disputed DNA analysis.

The Phantom Confession Note

Patel has repeatedly referenced a handwritten note purportedly left by the suspect, describing it as a confession that read, “I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I’m going to take it.” However, Patel admitted the note no longer exists—claiming it was destroyed—but insists the FBI has “forensic evidence” of its contents due to an “aggressive interview posture.”

Forensic analysts and legal experts have dismissed this as speculative at best. “A destroyed note with no physical record is not forensic evidence—it’s hearsay,” said one former federal prosecutor. “If this were presented in court, it would be laughed out as inadmissible.” Critics argue Patel’s phrasing—such as “positively processed” DNA—is deliberately vague, avoiding definitive claims of a match while implying guilt.

Disputed Ballistics and DNA Claims

Further skepticism surrounds the FBI’s assertion that ammunition recovered at the scene bore “transgender inscriptions”—a claim never substantiated with photographic evidence. Similarly, Patel’s declaration that DNA recovered from a towel and screwdriver linked to the suspect was “positively processed” has raised eyebrows. Forensic experts note that without a confirmed chain of custody or verifiable lab results, such claims hold little weight.

Ballistics matching—another pillar of the FBI’s case—has long been criticized as unreliable. Studies, including a 2009 National Academy of Sciences report, have found that bullet-to-barrel matching lacks scientific rigor, with error rates as high as 52% in some cases. “This isn’t CSI,” said a firearms analyst. “You can’t magically trace a bullet back to one specific gun without serious caveats.”

Political Motivations and Deep State Fears

Patel’s rhetoric has fueled accusations of a politically charged investigation. His insistence on a “sorcerer’s spell” narrative—where unseen forces manipulate public perception—has drawn comparisons to past FBI controversies, such as the January 6 prosecutions, where “virtual barriers” were retroactively defined to justify trespassing charges.

Some speculate the FBI is setting the stage for a broader crackdown on dissent, particularly against left-wing groups. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s recent push for “hate speech laws” has only intensified concerns. “This isn’t about justice—it’s about control,” warned one legal commentator. “First, they target the left, then they come for everyone else.”

The Bigger Picture: A Test of Public Gullibility

Adams argues that the Kirk case is part of a broader “global IQ test” to see how easily the public accepts unverified narratives. From COVID-era vaccine mandates to forensic pseudoscience, he warns that blind trust in authority enables systemic deception. “If people believe in imaginary notes and fake ballistics, they’ll believe anything,” he said.

As the investigation unfolds, one thing is clear: without transparent evidence and accountability, the FBI’s credibility—and the public’s faith in justice—hangs in the balance.

Watch the Sep. 16 episode of “Brighteon Broadcast News” as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, exposed fake forensics: The FBI is pushing loads of fake evidence to deceive us all.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.